 |


|
 |
Panel questions polygraph reliablity
2002-10-09
By Ben Finley
Knight Ridder News Service
WASHINGTON -- Polygraph
tests are intrinsically unreliable
when used to screen tens of thousands of federal employees for security breaches, a prestigious National Research Council panel
concluded in a study released
Tuesday.
There are no alternatives to the
tests, according to the panelists
who examined the polygraph's utility for the Department of Energy,
which operates federal nuclear and
weapons research facilities nationwide.
"This is a problem for national
security and clearly a problem for
the DOE," said Kevin Murphy, a
panelist from Pennsylvania State
University in University Park, Pa.
Thousands of federal employees
at the Department of Energy, the
FBI, the CIA, the National Security
Agency and other government facilities face regular polygraph
screening.
The study involved only the polygraph's use as a general screening device for large populations.
When focused on a specific crime
or unique facts or events, it probably is more reliable, panelists said.
The problem, they said, is that
polygraph tests, which measure
and record distinctive variations
in cardiovascular, respiratory and
skin-surface conductivity that suggest deception, produce a lot of
false-positive results.
That's because test responses
viewed as deceptive can have
other causes, such as stress and
exertion, said Stephen Feinberg, a
professor of statistics and computer science at Carnegie Mellon
University in Pittsburgh who
chaired the polygraph investigation panel.
Contact:
NEWS 9
|
The Oklahoman
|
NewsOK.com
|
Privacy Policy
|
Site Map
|
FAQ's
© 2002, Produced by NewsOK
|
|
|
|
|