<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tues Mar 13</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?feed=rss2&#038;p=101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=101</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:07:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Kraynak</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=101#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Kraynak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=101#comment-195</guid>
		<description>Can you go more into detail how the unknown φ is acquired?  The text seems to give two pretty distinct methods of using this value (parameter vector φ = f(θ) or using the distribution&#039;s median) and I&#039;m having trouble deciding when to use each method.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you go more into detail how the unknown φ is acquired?  The text seems to give two pretty distinct methods of using this value (parameter vector φ = f(θ) or using the distribution&#8217;s median) and I&#8217;m having trouble deciding when to use each method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Truncellito</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=101#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Truncellito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=101#comment-194</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure that I understand the distinction of arbitrary shuffles of the data from i.i.d. sampling, when both are drawn from the same model/pool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that I understand the distinction of arbitrary shuffles of the data from i.i.d. sampling, when both are drawn from the same model/pool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Bauman</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=101#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Bauman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=101#comment-193</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that both these methods would suffer greatly with smaller sample sizes.  Is there a rule of thumb that you follow to determine the minimum number of samples for performing the bootstrap?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that both these methods would suffer greatly with smaller sample sizes.  Is there a rule of thumb that you follow to determine the minimum number of samples for performing the bootstrap?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Tien</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=101#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Tien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 06:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=101#comment-192</guid>
		<description>It seems like resampling the data could amplify any sort of bias or error that was present. Is there a way of detecting this?

Similarly, is there a way of detecting when the data are not sufficiently i.i.d. samples? Can you give an example of the case where the sampling is not i.i.d.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like resampling the data could amplify any sort of bias or error that was present. Is there a way of detecting this?</p>
<p>Similarly, is there a way of detecting when the data are not sufficiently i.i.d. samples? Can you give an example of the case where the sampling is not i.i.d.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Dichter</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=101#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Dichter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 04:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=101#comment-191</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t quite understand the point of the parametric bootstrap. In order to generate data we have to estimate the distribution parameters. Well if we are willing to accept those parameters, why do we even care about generating data? If we must choose a distribution to use MLE, then we could just look up the variance of that distribution in a book and skip the data generation step. Also, how are we to know how much we can trust our estimation of theta?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t quite understand the point of the parametric bootstrap. In order to generate data we have to estimate the distribution parameters. Well if we are willing to accept those parameters, why do we even care about generating data? If we must choose a distribution to use MLE, then we could just look up the variance of that distribution in a book and skip the data generation step. Also, how are we to know how much we can trust our estimation of theta?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Panico</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=101#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Panico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 04:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=101#comment-190</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that the nonparametric bootstrap requires a very large sample set to allow the resampling to accurately represent the underlying CDF. Is there a good rule of thumb about sample size?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that the nonparametric bootstrap requires a very large sample set to allow the resampling to accurately represent the underlying CDF. Is there a good rule of thumb about sample size?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shubham Debnath</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=101#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Shubham Debnath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 04:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=101#comment-189</guid>
		<description>Because the parametric and nonparametric methods produce similar results and can be used for similar sets of data (albeit with a little manipulation), is there one used more often? Or perhaps preferred before trying the other one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because the parametric and nonparametric methods produce similar results and can be used for similar sets of data (albeit with a little manipulation), is there one used more often? Or perhaps preferred before trying the other one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharlene Flesher</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=101#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharlene Flesher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 03:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=101#comment-188</guid>
		<description>Under what circumstances would you use bootstrap, rather than another method, to estimate SE?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under what circumstances would you use bootstrap, rather than another method, to estimate SE?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=101#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 02:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=101#comment-187</guid>
		<description>It seems that the nonparametric bootstrap will in most cases be easier and just as effective, are there any real benefits from using the parametric bootstrap? Also, it is mentioned that one of the shortcomings of the nonparametric bootstrap is that it requires an i.i.d. sample; however, I would have thought that this would also be a requirement for the parametric bootstrap?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that the nonparametric bootstrap will in most cases be easier and just as effective, are there any real benefits from using the parametric bootstrap? Also, it is mentioned that one of the shortcomings of the nonparametric bootstrap is that it requires an i.i.d. sample; however, I would have thought that this would also be a requirement for the parametric bootstrap?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Rasmussen</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=101#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Rasmussen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=101#comment-186</guid>
		<description>I am confused as to how the estimator given in 9.21 would be more efficient than computing the sample mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am confused as to how the estimator given in 9.21 would be more efficient than computing the sample mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

