<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tues Apr 24</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?feed=rss2&#038;p=126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=126</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:07:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Kraynak</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=126#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Kraynak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=126#comment-338</guid>
		<description>Is there a formal procedure that can be used to determine the time intervals for computing spectral density estimates, or is it mostly arbitrary/intuitive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a formal procedure that can be used to determine the time intervals for computing spectral density estimates, or is it mostly arbitrary/intuitive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=126#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=126#comment-337</guid>
		<description>In linear filtering, I&#039;m not quite sure why it&#039;s necessary to pad the Fourier transform with zeroes if the filtered range is really what we&#039;re interested in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In linear filtering, I&#8217;m not quite sure why it&#8217;s necessary to pad the Fourier transform with zeroes if the filtered range is really what we&#8217;re interested in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharlene Flesher</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=126#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharlene Flesher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=126#comment-336</guid>
		<description>In 18.3.3, it is emphasized that smoothing of the periodogram is critical to get a good estimation of the spectral density function- how much of the data gets lost in the smoothing processes? Of those mentioned, are some more or less conservative about smoothing over important fluctuations?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 18.3.3, it is emphasized that smoothing of the periodogram is critical to get a good estimation of the spectral density function- how much of the data gets lost in the smoothing processes? Of those mentioned, are some more or less conservative about smoothing over important fluctuations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Zhou</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=126#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>David Zhou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=126#comment-335</guid>
		<description>I really liked the detail that you go into about how to create a spectrogram, thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really liked the detail that you go into about how to create a spectrogram, thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Tien</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=126#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Tien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=126#comment-334</guid>
		<description>Are there any kind of tests to determine if aliasing is going on in your data? Perhaps by varying sampling frequency methodically?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there any kind of tests to determine if aliasing is going on in your data? Perhaps by varying sampling frequency methodically?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=126#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 06:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=126#comment-333</guid>
		<description>p538 on the introduction of bias:  Is there a way to gauge the magnitude of the bias relative to the variation in the log periodogram.  Is this an intuitive judgement call or one for which rules exist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>p538 on the introduction of bias:  Is there a way to gauge the magnitude of the bias relative to the variation in the log periodogram.  Is this an intuitive judgement call or one for which rules exist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=126#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 06:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=126#comment-332</guid>
		<description>p538</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>p538</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Rasmussen</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=126#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Rasmussen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 02:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=126#comment-330</guid>
		<description>What is the difference in effect between smoothing the periodagram versus detrending the data prior to estimating the periodagram? It seems like they might be somewhat similar, but it is hard to tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the difference in effect between smoothing the periodagram versus detrending the data prior to estimating the periodagram? It seems like they might be somewhat similar, but it is hard to tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric VanEpps</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=126#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric VanEpps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 22:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=126#comment-329</guid>
		<description>In section 18.3.3, you discuss 5 different smoothing methods.  Are there any good reasons for choosing one method over another, beyond convenience?  Do any of the methods have slightly more desirable properties or are any of the methods more accepted as normal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In section 18.3.3, you discuss 5 different smoothing methods.  Are there any good reasons for choosing one method over another, beyond convenience?  Do any of the methods have slightly more desirable properties or are any of the methods more accepted as normal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Dichter</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=126#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Dichter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 05:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=126#comment-328</guid>
		<description>Is the Nyquist frequency a hard boundary? What if there is noise in the data?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the Nyquist frequency a hard boundary? What if there is noise in the data?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

