<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thurs Feb 9</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?feed=rss2&#038;p=83" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=83</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:07:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Kraynak</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=83#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Kraynak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=83#comment-97</guid>
		<description>By π I mean pi, it&#039;s not showing up on the browser well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By π I mean pi, it&#8217;s not showing up on the browser well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Kraynak</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=83#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Kraynak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=83#comment-96</guid>
		<description>What significance does the π term have in the pdf π(θ) = fθ(θ) ?  Is it a term simply chosen because its independence from the other terms and not because of its value?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What significance does the π term have in the pdf π(θ) = fθ(θ) ?  Is it a term simply chosen because its independence from the other terms and not because of its value?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yijuan</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=83#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Yijuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=83#comment-95</guid>
		<description>When should we use Bayes’ Theorem for uncertainty assessment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When should we use Bayes’ Theorem for uncertainty assessment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Truncellito</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=83#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Truncellito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=83#comment-94</guid>
		<description>What kinds of problem advantage using the credible interval over using the confidence interval?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What kinds of problem advantage using the credible interval over using the confidence interval?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Dichter</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=83#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Dichter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=83#comment-93</guid>
		<description>Are we justified in modeling chi^2 as a Poisson just because it is a count? Are there ever counts that are poorly modeled by a Poisson distribution? Also, how would you handle a continuous distribution? You could bin it, but the size of the bin will be arbitrary. Is there a better way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we justified in modeling chi^2 as a Poisson just because it is a count? Are there ever counts that are poorly modeled by a Poisson distribution? Also, how would you handle a continuous distribution? You could bin it, but the size of the bin will be arbitrary. Is there a better way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mpanico</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=83#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>mpanico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=83#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Is the width of the confidence interval always similar to the width of the credible interval?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the width of the confidence interval always similar to the width of the credible interval?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Tien</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=83#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Tien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=83#comment-91</guid>
		<description>It seems that the last sentence of 7.3.9 contradicts the arguments made earlier. So is it actually OK to think of the confidence interval as there being 95% probability that the parameter is in the interval? If not exactly true, is this still a useful way to think about it or are there cases where this way of considering CIs leads us to significant errors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that the last sentence of 7.3.9 contradicts the arguments made earlier. So is it actually OK to think of the confidence interval as there being 95% probability that the parameter is in the interval? If not exactly true, is this still a useful way to think about it or are there cases where this way of considering CIs leads us to significant errors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharlene Flesher</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=83#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharlene Flesher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=83#comment-90</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t fully understand how the U and L of the CI are random variables- can you clarify how they are random variables rather than constants?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t fully understand how the U and L of the CI are random variables- can you clarify how they are random variables rather than constants?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shubham Debnath</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=83#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Shubham Debnath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=83#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Instead of a uniform distribution when assigning one as a prior distribution, can one use any other one? Obviously uniform is the most obvious and simplest, but can you use a normal distribution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of a uniform distribution when assigning one as a prior distribution, can one use any other one? Obviously uniform is the most obvious and simplest, but can you use a normal distribution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Rasmussen</title>
		<link>http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=83#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Rasmussen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~kass/smnp/?p=83#comment-88</guid>
		<description>I am still having trouble understanding how the degrees of freedom is calculated from the different scenarios.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am still having trouble understanding how the degrees of freedom is calculated from the different scenarios.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

