Is my bounce rate due to my HIT display?

My HITS have a rather high bounce rate. Between 40-50% of the Turkers who preview my HIT, choose not to accept it. I previously posted a histogram of the screen widths that I observed from workers who had accepted at least one HIT. That is very clearly a biased sample; it could be that only workers with screens large enough to comfortably display my HIT choose to accept it. I was curious to see if there was another population of Turkers that chose not to accept my HIT because their screens were too small.

I made the necessary modifications to my webapp and then generated the following graph:

Histogram split by worker acceptance

Screen resolution observed for Experiment 15

You’ll notice that there isn’t much of a practical difference between the workers who accept the HIT and those that do not. This makes me feel a little better. I’m not worried that my bounce rate is due to a display artifact. It does make me wonder though, is my bounce rate typical?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>