Team F - Safewalk

* very nice project, nice presentation

* looks like info worth sharing with Student Life (safewalk)
  and University Police (manages escort).  

* MNAR is not a reason to not impute, but rather a reason to think
  that it will be hard to get imputation right.  Nevertheless dropping
  incomplete cases was fine for this project.

* During the presentation I wondered (but did not ask!) whether it
  might make sense to analyze grad students separately from
  undergrads, since their use of campus, self-perception, etc. are
  quite different.

* I also wondered whether the question about comfort level with
  safewalk groups might be a bit hypothetical to get "real" answers.
  [how comfortable you feel walking with someone depends not only on
  their gender but also their appearance, behavior, etc.].  However, I
  did not have a better way to ask this as a survey question!

* The result that Escort has higher potential usabiliy than Safewalk
  was interesting and valuable.  I also thought your answers about why
  Escort seemed to have higher potential for use than Safewalk was
  interesting.



Introduction:                                         10/10

Body:                                                 50/50
 
Conclusion:                                            10/10

Individuals:                                           /30

Katherine Swintek          kswintek@andrew.cmu.edu     30/30   100
Evan Korol                 ekorol@andrew.cmu.edu       30/30   100
Ivan Busharov              ibouchar@cmu.edu	       30/30   100
Jaclyn Bernard             jbernard@andrew.cmu.edu     30/30   100

Each person will get a score which is the sum of the above (so, 70 pts
from group preparation of slides, 30 pts for individual presentation),
except that no-shows will get 0.